View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-23-2008, 02:28 PM
shelly's Avatar
shelly shelly is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 198
Thanks: 7
Thanked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seb View Post
Shelly,

I agree with Andrew...Covenant Theology is the only proper way to understand much of the Bible.

Without it you have a lot of disconnected pictures drawn in Scripture without being able to put them together to see God's big picture / plan.

Think of CT as the 'tree trunk' that most of Reformed Theology branches off of. If one doesn't understand or trust CT - I don't see how one can be reformed, I don't see how the Doctrines of Grace can be properly understood, and I don't see how you can properly preach the Scriptures.

Maybe you can take some time and read this excellent (and short) article on the subject : (Covenant Theology Illustrated)

A quote from the article:
Quote:
"Covenant is the fabric of the whole Bible. Once this fundamental schema of covenant in the Scriptures comes clear, all the patterns of God's relations with the sons and daughters of Adam unfolds into a rich tapestry unifying the Scriptures."
Steve,
Thank you for the article link. I read it and see that the point seems to be that the continuity of OT and NT is best served by covenant theology.
What I don't see in this article is a great difference in the way some things are explained with CT in mind compared to Dispy such as: first Adam/last Adam, sin and righteousness imputed to us. Maybe that's why it's so difficult for me to see the clear differences between CT and DT.

I was taught some covenant things in a dispy way that was sometimes truth(I think) but more often twisted the truth in some way. This covenant or that one was for those in the OT or Israel not for us. I never could figure out how "they" decided which covenant was for us and which one was for Israel; didn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to it.

So can a church or a pastor call covenant theology irrelevant, not believe in dispensational theology and yet still believe and preach and practice the doctrines of grace? I have seen this lived out, but perhaps they really do believe in CT if they knew what it was. Sounds lame doesn't it?

I leave out all end times things and figure it'll all come out in the wash. But I still believe in the doctrines of grace and I see the continuity between OT and NT(sorta). I would have no problem baptizing future children. I get the baptism thing. Is this all that covenant theology is? baptizing babies and understanding that the elect are spiritual Israel(but don't get ethnic Israel mixed up with spiritual Israel-good luck with that)
__________________
Life is a journey; learn to enjoy it.
shelly {approved by admins for limited information in signature}
attending a reformed church

Last edited by shelly; 02-26-2008 at 05:18 PM..