
02-19-2008, 03:43 PM
|
 | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,192
Thanks: 406
Thanked 248 Times in 145 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sydnorphyn Ok, here goes, Gen. 3.1 is very specific in saying the serpent, was a serpent, was a serpent. There is no reason to read anything else into it - of course, some do see Satan, but I would suggest this is probably Christian Mythology. The question in my mind is, what is the purpose of the story and how would the post-Egyptian (or later) generation have heard it - not how WE hear it. Genesis 1-3 is an interpretation of the early period, how would the early hearers have understood it - this is the question.
Peace
John |
"And he seized the dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, [...]" Rev 20:2 (ESV)
__________________
Steve Butts - Former SBC-er
Three Forms of Unity - Bradenton CRC - Bradenton, Florida (A conservative member in a conservative congregation) "Turning away to false Theology is equal to turning away to false gods" — Francis Schaeffer (Death in the City) |