Thread: Missing Texts?
View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-11-2008, 09:51 PM
larryjf's Avatar
larryjf larryjf is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,414
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 72
Thanked 292 Times in 185 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by caoclan View Post
OK, what I am gathering from this site (Trinitarian Bible Society) is that the AV (or KJV) is the only translation that is truly faithful to the original manuscripts? Are there no "modern" (or more readable) translations that are correct, or acceptable? I want to be faithful in handling God's word, but (much less important than correct translation) I would like a more readable version than the AV. Any thoughts?
The only widely available new translation that would be close to the KJV would be the NKJV (New King James Version).

Keep in mind that there are others who disagree that these are based off of the best manuscripts.

I would recommend doing some research as to how each camp (pro-KJV, pro-modern version, etc) defends their position. Here are some resources to get you started...

Robinson, The case for Byzantine priority

Bible.org: Why I Do Not Think the King James Bible Is the Best Translation Available Today

Demar
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/
Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
“The Christian must not be of such a complying nature as to cut the coat of his profession according to the fashion of the times…" - William Gurnall
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to larryjf For This Useful Post:
caoclan (02-11-2008), Ivan (02-12-2008)