I'm awful with names, so most likely you're right.
Sometimes it's situations such as this one that brings to light existing weaknesses, such as the fact that the handy guide within the BCO concerning precisely
how such examinations are to be conducted isn't being followed by some presbyteries.
And it's been my experience that if two groups of people - such as the LAP and that other presbytery - are doing something wrong, the overwhelming odds are
others are doing it wrong, too.
What do you want to bet additional presbyteries have read the LAP's examination and gulped, realizing it bears a strong resemblance to the last one
they conducted?
Oopsie-doopsie.
