02-10-2008, 05:54 AM
|
 | Moderator | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,289
Thanks: 131
Thanked 303 Times in 167 Posts
| |
 Will that be the foundation of their defense?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles  Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim | Interesting. I naturally assumed the trial would proceed since the purpose of the trial was to have the Presbytery answer the charges that it didn't properly discharge its duties in examining Wilkins. I don't know why folks would think that Wilkins leaving the PCA would somehow eradicate the fact that when he was examined that they either did or did not perform due diligence in the task. It will be interesting to see what kind of defense they offer in demonstrating that they thought Wilkins' answers were Confessional. | Or will their defense be to attempt to show they did, in fact, follow the BCO's approved procedure for an examination?
I'd thought the idea was that the LAP skipped the methodology provided by the BCO, instead substituting their own, and that's why Pr. Wilkins' views got a pass. 
But I've been known to be wrong.
__________________ Anne Ivy
Christ Chapel Bible Church
Fort Worth, Texas
Widowed mother of six, grandmother of eight.
The Ivy Vine (my blog)
|