01-25-2008, 08:55 AM
|
 | Administrator | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 7,586
Thanks: 820
Thanked 737 Times in 457 Posts
| |
I missed this yesterday; that's very nice of you to say; thanks Rich. Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles  Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Brian Schwertley, Chris Coldwell, Matthew Winzer, Nathan Eshelman. | Quote:
Originally Posted by NaphtaliPress That's flattering; but I'm more thinking of decades of witness and writings, etc. | I have to say, Chris, one of the reasons I love you is that you do have genuine modesty. I know you will probably always undervalue your contribution and I know you will always give glory to Christ for all of it, but the works you are publishing have been extremely God-honouring both for the RPW and the Christian Sabbath.
I know how tirelessly you labor to edit and publish great Puritan works and the CPJ for a pittance compared to the inestimable worth that those works contain.
Whether you will ever be considered a giant is of no importance but I want to thank you for the work you do. |
__________________
Chris Coldwell
Lakewood Presbyterian Church (PCA), Member • Naphtali Press: Presbyterian & Reformed Books • The Confessional Presbyterian, A Journal for Discussion of Presbyterian Doctrine & Practice • The Blue Banner Archive When heresy rises in an evangelical body, it is never frank and open. It always begins by skulking, and assuming a disguise. Its advocates, when together, boast of great improvements, and congratulate one another on having gone greatly beyond the ‘old dead orthodoxy,’ and on having left behind many of its antiquated errors: but when taxed with deviations from the received faith, they complain of the unreasonableness of their accusers, as they ‘differ from it only in words.’ This has been the standing course of errorists ever since the apostolic age. Samuel Miller, Introductory essay, The Articles of the Synod of Dort (1841).
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions? |