Originally Posted by ReformationArt

I am happy to know of this resource!

However, in taking a quick glance at the Master of Theology curriculum, I am struck that at the great disparity between the work required at NARS and other Reformed seminaries.

For instance, the 3 systematic theology courses each only require reading of one book (each of the three courses requires one volume of Hodge's ST), and writing a number of essays. However, one of the great benefits of seminary is not just getting a reading list, but the lectures, the explanations, the proddings of the experienced and learned professors, and interaction with other students. These seem to be absent from the NARS program, except for interaction with the mentor. However, the question remains as to the giftedness of each mentor, the time they have to give, the quality of interaction, etc.

I've done a good bit of thinking along these lines myself, as I started and run the Amarillo Theological Institute. However, our ST courses are currently taped lectures from Reformed Seminaries, and the required reading from those courses are made available in the church library, while I facilitate discussion with the students. However, I make it clear that ATI in no way takes the place of the seminary. IMO, NARS looks good for a lay person, or a RE or Deacon candidate who wants to learn more. I don't see it as in the same league as the training that is taking place at other Reformed seminaries (at this time).

However, I do encourage you to keep plodding forward in your efforts to help others grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ!