View Single Post
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:59 AM
armourbearer's Avatar
armourbearer armourbearer is offline.
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 4,796
Thanks: 577
Thanked 2,180 Times in 863 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnOwen007 View Post
If there is another source of light other than the sun creating a "morning" and an "evening" on the first 3 days, then why is the sun created on the 4th day when this other source of light (not explicitly mentioned in the narrative) was doing precisely that same job? If there was a "morning" and an "evening" at the end of the first day, and we don't have a sun, then we're dealing with a very unique "morning" and "evening", which begs the question whether it can be called a "morning" or an "evening". etc. etc.
The Scripture explicitly says there were three alternations of "evening and morning" prior to the creation of the heavenly lights, so I am very confident it can indeed be called what Scripture says it was.
__________________
Yours sincerely,


"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to armourbearer For This Useful Post:
py3ak (01-09-2008), SolaGratia (02-25-2008)