View Single Post
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2008, 08:05 PM
Ivanhoe Ivanhoe is offline.
Puritanboard Doctor
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 9,871
Thanks: 860
Thanked 769 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuritanCovenanter View Post
Jacob,
I believe you are doing to me what you did to me in the Theonomy thread. You are going beyond what I am saying. Reread what I wrote. Read it more slowly. Don't react emotionally. Just for example... in this quote,...
I realize that I sounded emotional. I wasn't. I just worked out. I can't get too excited either way at the moment.

Quote:
... you seem to be implying that I am reading back motives into their actions. Where have I done this?
As I understand it, I am seeing people fail to separate the men from the issues. I was understanding you to read Leithart's FV back into this book and then judge this book accordingly. Forgive me if I read it wrongly. Here is how I would handle it: If I knew a better, contemporary response to PM, I would first recommend that (see below). If there wasn't one, I would first summarize said arguments and have coffee with someone and just "talk about it." I think I am good at that with people. But, the above two don't work, and they still want to "read" something, perhaps even Leithart, ok, I might recommend this and say, "Here is what he says is good, bad, whatever."

Quote:
One more thing. You know of books that would be comparable and being more updated and contemporary. You read more than I do. You can give some recommendations besides Leithart. My point was that this subject has been written about. CT said he was new to this.
This is tricky because postmodernism has morphed. First of all, Gene Edward Veith wrote Postmodern Times. It was good 5 years ago. It is probably too basic but it would be the first book I give to the man in the pew.

A Christian defense of postmodernism (don't ask why) would be James KA Smith's Who's Afraid of Postmodernism? I probably wouldn't recommend this one.

I am not dismissing Carson's Gagging of God. He makes good points.

For a more academic read, see Radical Orthodoxy and the Reformed Tradition. This isn't responding to postmodernism, per se, but to its step-cousin.

there are a few others that slip my mind. I used to know the answer to this question. Good question. Sorry if I came across angry.
__________________
J. B. Atken
John Knox PCA
Layman, M.A. student at Louisiana College