View Single Post
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:22 AM
greenbaggins's Avatar
greenbaggins greenbaggins is offline now.
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hague, North Dakota
Posts: 3,061
Thanks: 981
Thanked 2,441 Times in 838 Posts
With a claim this sweeping, it is only fair to ask about the sources which have led you to this conclusion. The Vatican never let Vaticanus out of its library until the 1880-1890's. Sinaiticus was not available. Many of the Alexandrian papyri also were not available. This raises the question of how much of the Alexandrian tradition there was to reject. Yes, I do bring up individual manuscripts. In fact, I have brought up the most important Alexandrian manuscripts precisely to address this point. The fact that some have abused the manuscript tradition to argue for corruption in the text is not even remotely a logical argument against the manuscripts themselves, or against the text-form. I dare say that I would have argued with the Reformers, since there were hardly any Alexandrian texts available, and thus it was easy to argue that the Alexandrian tradition was an aberration. However, that is not true anymore.
__________________
Rev. Lane Keister
Teaching Elder, PCA, North Dakota (working out of bounds in a CRC and an RCA church)
http://greenbaggins.wordpress.com
http://brahmsgreenglove.blogspot.com
http://accenttranslation.blogspot.com
Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to greenbaggins For This Useful Post:
Daniel Ritchie (01-05-2008), JohnOwen007 (03-07-2008)