View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 02:56 PM
R. Scott Clark's Avatar
R. Scott Clark R. Scott Clark is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 1,994
Thanks: 12
Thanked 717 Times in 258 Posts
Hi Kevin,

I was thinking of the PCA report adopted by GA many years ago and the RCUS report of 1985 or so. I should probably be more precise. I don't know that the OPC has ever acted on theonomy and the URC has not.

rsc

ps. I deleted the parenthetical comment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin View Post
Dr Scott I just read your piece & I have one (tangential) question. You said that
"Today the FV movement (like theonomy before it) has been rejected by all the major denominations in the North American Presbyterian and Reformed Council ...".

I was wondering if you have a link to more info re Theonomy being rejected by "...all major denominations in (NAPARC)"?

I have a great deal of interest in both the doctrine & the movement and I was unaware that it had been directly rejected in any official way by any creditable denomination.

Thanks.
__________________
R. Scott Clark, D.Phil
Professor of Church History and Historical Theology

"For Christ, His Gospel, and His Church"
Associate Pastor
Oceanside URC
The Heidelblog
Office Hours Podcast

Last edited by R. Scott Clark; 12-27-2007 at 02:58 PM. Reason: correction of fact