View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-18-2007, 07:50 PM
RRHeustisJr's Avatar
RRHeustisJr RRHeustisJr is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cool

Quote:
Originally Posted by Contra_Mundum View Post

How about Gal 3:28?

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus."
Exactly.

But, does this mean that females were not part of the Covenant in the Old, but now they are, according to Paedobaptist theology? If Galatians 3:28 is used to bolster Paedobaptism, then are we to believe that females were treated just like the Greek in the Old, which is why females (and Greeks) were not circumcised?
__________________
Reed R. Heustis, Jr., Esq.
Christian Constitutionalist
Member, Trinity Reformed Baptist Church, La Mirada, California
Association of Reformed Baptist Churches of America