View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-04-2007, 05:21 PM
Scott's Avatar
Scott Scott is offline.
Puritanboard Graduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,907
Thanks: 8
Thanked 30 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Right Ken, is the argument basically that new revelations of the Spirit are okay just as long as they are not added to the text of Scripture. To me this is strange; if there are new revelations, then why can't they be added to the text of Scripture?
The test for canonization is broader than whether something is inspired. A lot of special revelation was not inscripturated. The Holy Spirit preserved what he willed for the Church. Canonical revelation is that body of revelation that was meant for the Church throughout time. With other special revelation, God had more specific purposes aside from edifying the entire Church. Think of it as the difference between a father's letter to his entire family and a father's letter to his daughter. The first letter is for a broader audience and the second is for only one person.
__________________
Scott Roberts
Ruling Elder, Lakeside Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Southlake, Texas