View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 11-07-2007, 10:34 PM
Jim_Johnston's Avatar
Jim_Johnston Jim_Johnston is offline.
Puritanboard Sophomore
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 602
Thanks: 7
Thanked 109 Times in 68 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bosse View Post
With that said, I do not think Reformed Epistemology is properly called an apologetic method, even though it can be used with an apologetic method. The reason for my thinking being this way is that Reformed apologetics is really not offensive in nature. It does not provide a reason for someone to reject 'X' and embrace Christianity. It does provide an answer why my belief in God is warranted. So, it is not fair to compare it with all of the other methods listed.
I'd have to agree here.

Even though RE guy Kelly James Clark contributed to Zondervan's 5 Views on Apologetics Book, Michael Sudduth told me that RE was not an apologetic *method* but that doesn't mean an RE can't have a *view* on apologetics.

In this sense, the poll is misleading....
__________________
Regards,

J.J.
PCA
Suffix