Quote:
Originally Posted by tcalbrecht  Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it  ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible. | Though Rush's idealism would not affect how he brings out the socio-political significance of events within the book. Another problem with James Jordan is his multi-perspectivalism (or whatever its called).:2cents: | “Interpretive maximalism” |
Yes, that is what you call it. 
__________________
Daniel Ritchie
Saintfield, Northern Ireland - Queen's University, Belfast:History/Politics
Member of Dromara Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland (Covenanter)
|