10-18-2007, 02:20 PM
|
 | Puritanboard Junior | | Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 1,437
Thanks: 11
Thanked 95 Times in 63 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Ritchie  Quote:
Originally Posted by Spear Dane Rushdoony is an idealist. Jordan's commentary cannot simply be dismissed (although I as a premillennialist do take issue with it  ). Jordan does brutalize liberal scholarship and force you to think about the whole Bible. | Though Rush's idealism would not affect how he brings out the socio-political significance of events within the book. Another problem with James Jordan is his multi-perspectivalism (or whatever its called).:2cents: | “Interpretive maximalism”
__________________
Tom Albrecht
Member, Covenant URCNA, New Holland, PA.
"I'm not a famous man. I'm just a simple country doctor with horse sense."
|