View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-02-2007, 10:25 AM
44jason's Avatar
44jason 44jason is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wildomar, CA
Posts: 84
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lt.Col.,
Thanks for the response saying:
Quote:
Respectfully, you are missing the force of what Paul is laying out in Galatians if you think that he is laying out the notion that the full meaning of circumcision is found in Galatians 5:3-4.
But I wasn't attempting to exegete all of Galatians but to point out the lack of support Galatians has for Mark's and Matt's usage of it.

And David, as far as a critique is concerned. Mark asked for the following:
Quote:
Finally, I would suggest anyone who disagrees with the argument to provide an answer as to why we should now exclude infants from the same Abrahamic covenant, that is still in effect per Gal. 3:8.
That is what I did. Thank you.
I was simply pointing out that Mark (and Matt for that matter) are accusing credo's of something that just isn't true -- at least in my humble little mind that sits in my hard head that once was fully immersed at a very young age for the glory of God.
__________________
~ Destined to Know Him ~
Jason E. Robertson
a Pastor of Murrieta Valley Church, CA
FIDE-O