View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-27-2007, 08:47 PM
Andrew P.C.'s Avatar
Andrew P.C. Andrew P.C. is offline.
Puritanboard Freshman
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Reno, NV(Soon to be shipped to Camp Pendleton)
Posts: 479
Thanks: 15
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reformed-Kermit View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew P.C. View Post
Is there a cut between the NT and OT or is there continuity? IF yes, why? If no, why?

I also posted in another thread this statement and question:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew P.C. View Post
As I have been personally studying this issue for over a few days now, there has been something that I've seen in scripture(since this is the first time I've given serious thought to this matter). The OT and NT have continuity. NO WHERE in scripture is there a command to STOP giving the sign of the covenant to the childeren. I won't get into it now, but I'm beginning to see the continuity of the Covenant of Grace through-out the church(OT and NT).

So, the question really is: Where in scripture is the command to STOP GIVING the sign of the covenant to the infant?
Could anyone (a baptist) respond to this?
a divisive chip on your shoulder more than anything...
Huh? Divisive...? How am I being divisive? I'm not even a paedo-baptist...
__________________
Andrew Cunningham
Reno, NV(Soon to ship out to Camp Pendleton...USMC)
Attending:Community Bible Church (Reformed-ish, Non-denom)
"by His scourging we are healed" Isaiah 53:5
"Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity and cleanse me from my sin" Psalm 51:2