Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer Quote:
Originally Posted by A5pointer Sorry if this highjacks the thread but the issue seems to be literallness of texts. | Actually, the issue is verbal trustworthiness of the Word of God. The Bible is to be interpreted literally from cover to cover. It is only by understanding the literal import of a figure of speech that the figure conveys meaning. It is only by literally interpreting a text that it can be discerned the text is employing figures of speech. There must be literal markers within the text which indicate figures and metaphors are being used. Else the intepreter has no warrant to argue for a figurative meaning to the words. In Gen 1, Job and Jonah no such markers exist. The passages make perfect sense understood literally. |
This has always been my method. Unless it states in some way that the portion is not literal such as Jesus speaking in Parables, then it is to be taken literally.
__________________ Imagine something clever here!
John Beaver
The Episcopal Church (formerly ECUSA)
St. Matthew's Episcopal Church
Westerville, OH.
I affirm the 39 Articles of Religion
|