08-20-2007, 09:34 PM
|
 | Moderator | | Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 5,194
Thanks: 637
Thanked 2,443 Times in 988 Posts
| |
Quote:
Originally Posted by SemperFideles  I'm sorry, I couldn't help myself but why is it when we discuss the Scipturalism of Scripturalism that we have to constantly get into logical notation? Isn't it possible to argue for it apart from using P, A, and B (unless used as letters in a word). | If Pumpkin, then Asparagus and Beans. My order for roast lunch. 
__________________
Yours sincerely, 
"Illum oportet crescere me autem minui."
|