View Single Post
  #219 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2007, 10:16 AM
Civbert's Avatar
Civbert Civbert is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: State of Franklin
Posts: 1,876
Thanks: 110
Thanked 67 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobVigneault View Post
Today's super yeasts are more able to endure higher alcohol levels but I don't believe this argument needs to be about alcohol level. Alcohol is not the problem, drunkeness is.
I agree. But it helps to know what the wine was like back then, and how it was consumed. They probably drank quarts or gallons a day, but it may have had much lower alcohol content and was often diluted with water. We don't tend to add water to our wine, nor can we drink the same quantities without getting drunk.

I wonder if the several glasses of wine back then would even give you a buzz? Today, I can't drink more than half a glass without it effecting my head. And back then, getting drunk was probably expensive. You'd need to be rich to be an alcoholic them. ... Maybe. ... Just wondering.
__________________
R. Anthony Coletti
Midway Presbyterian Church (PCA)
Jonesborough, TN
[i]et venite et arguite me dicit Dominus[/i]