Paul Helms writes this, referring to Samuel Rutherford:
Quote:
|
Rutherford advocated the action of the civil magistrate by a ‘civil sanction’ to make men and women conform to what, in the best judgement of the orthodox ministers of religion, was the true Christian doctrine, way of life and mode of worship. Rutherford had, in common with many others at that period, both a horror and a fear of pluralism. He was equally as much afraid of pluralism as any English monarch or bishop seeking to impose and to enforce uniformity of worship in the courts, even though he made a principled distinction, as they did not, between the work of a minister of the gospel and the work of the civil magistrate. Though in practice this principle boils down to the same thing: New Presbyter is Old Priest writ large.
|
With respect to the issue of toleration, is the bolded statement fair? The quote is from
Rutherford and the Limits of Toleration.