View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2007, 11:02 AM
shackleton's Avatar
shackleton shackleton is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kansas City, KS
Posts: 1,064
Thanks: 97
Thanked 105 Times in 82 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJClark View Post
Had He never aged or looked older He would have remained the infant...
That's the point I was trying to get at. Are aging and looking older, and ultimately dying, the the curse of sin or the result of the Fall? Or, are they the natural result of life? If Christ was born without a sin nature, then would he have aged indefinatly and looked older?

If Christ did not have Adam's guilt imputed onto Him then He would not have been guilty, thus He would not have had the curse of sin, which is death. If this is the case did Christ die because He was crucified and in that death He had all our sins placed on Him thus paying for them? Or did He die because our sins were imputed onto Him and at that time making Him guilty and able to die and in His death paying for our sins?

I am probably not making sense or trying to derive too much out of it.
__________________
Erick Bohndorf, Covenant Baptist Church, KS
http://qayaqtraveler.blogspot.com/

"Man is retarded by the sluggishness of the flesh, and make's less progress than he ought. The Law acts like a whip to the flesh, urging it on as men do a lazy sluggish ass. Even in the case of a spiritual man, inasmuch as he is still burdened with the weight of the flesh, the Law is a constant stimulus, pricking him forward when he would indulge in sloth."-John Calvin Book II, chapter 7 sec. 12