Quote:
Originally Posted by armourbearer  Civbert's insistence that God's knowledge is bound by the laws of logic (as per the archetype/ectype thread) shuts him up to the conclusion that God has parts as if He were finite. This is what happens when you make a god no bigger than what your own mind can conceive. I am sorry to be harsh, but this is the brutal consequence of deviating from the reformed tradition. |
The infinity of God does not imply singularity. Rather the opposite is true. Something finite can be one things, and one is a finite number.
I don't' find you harsh Rev Winzer, just
incomprehensible.
