I was thinking about it. I think one can make the argument that McGrath has too much postmodernism in him, but he only uses that as a critique of the Enlightenment. I think he is wrong to do so, but this isn't so bad.
I really enjoyed his book on Calvin. I didn't see any Barthianisms in there. I didn't come away saying that Jesus is the "Yes" to the world, or whatever Barth said.
And Mcgrath can't be that bad. McMahon does a serious interaction with him elsewhere.
http://apuritansmind.com/Reformation...eformation.htm