06-29-2007, 02:35 PM
|
 | Puritanboard Professor | | Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Wrightwood, CA
Posts: 5,535
Thanks: 2,212
Thanked 520 Times in 314 Posts
| |
Quote: |
Although I seek to offer such for the TR/KJV (though it is under fire from all other camps, including R&P’s!), the CT is likewise under fire, and such a withering blast it is that I do not see how one can maintain it, yet some do.
| In many ways, the CT advocates have become exactly what they accuse KJV advocates to be. Quote: |
It should be understood that it is impossible to prove which of two or more competing wording variations is the original since the originals have long since disappeared. But it is the height of folly to throw the settled received text of three and one-half centuries into the dustbin to make a revision when the exact contents of thousands of existing copies of mainstream manuscript tradition manuscripts is unknown...and...Moorman continues, “When Aleph and B, the two main pillars of the critical text, display 3,000 clear differences in the Gospels (they must be weary of hearing this!); then what candidate do they propose for ‘relatively uncorrupted tradition.’?
| Equals: Folly indeed
__________________  http://www.villagecommunitychurch.org/
"Preparing a sermon is like cooking a meal. You need pots and pans and utensils, but you don't bring them out to the table where people are eating." Derek Thomas
|