Quote:
Originally Posted by victorbravo  From a data perspective, the proponent has a long way to go to demonstrate how often "good mutations" have in fact occurred. Most evolutionists rely upon speculation based upon assumptions to "prove" this.
In other words, their observations are not sufficient to support the premise. The use the conclusion (evolution must exist) to establish the premise of good mutations. |
Why does he have to demonstrate how often beneficial mutations occur? Is it not enough that they do occur with some predictability?