John is correct - also - we shouldn't follow the path of the atheist and bump up against the limits of revealed knowledge, then assume since we can find apparent contradictions for one piece of the puzzle, the entire worldview is flawed. We know that there are things we may not understand and limits to human knowledge, since
now we see in a mirror dimly. The atheist does not start from this presupposition, they believe everything can be discerned through evidence of the senses, logic and the scientific method, thus their tolerance for antinomy is limited - our is not so limited, because we trust in a greater knowledge than ourselves for ultimate resolution\revelation.