View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-21-2007, 09:44 AM
panta dokimazete's Avatar
panta dokimazete panta dokimazete is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,303
Thanks: 569
Thanked 331 Times in 247 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsup View Post
To say that the Old Testament is incomplete because the name of Jesus hadn't been explicity revealed is faulty. The Old Testament writers were inspired by God to write exactly what He told them. To say that you shouldn't use the Psalms because they don't bear the name of Jesus excludes the names of the Father and Spirit. That's like saying don't study Revelation because it's incomplete. Yes, Jesus is the name above all names, but God hasn't made the OT obsolete because the Messiah hadn't arrived then. Are we not sing praises to Him with "psalms" and spiritual songs?
Again - the point is missed.

No one is proposing that the Psalms be ignored or that the OT is obsolete.

The proposition is that requiring the singing the Psalms exclusively implicitly forbids the NT church to incorporate the explicitly revealed name of our savior and Lord, Jesus, into the public expression of worship in song. Unlike any other public worship element.
__________________
-JD
1Thess5:21
Ordained Deacon, PCA
Serving in an Acts 29 Church

MS

My links: ChristianSkepticism.org | personal | facebook | Prescriptive Psalmody

Last edited by panta dokimazete; 06-21-2007 at 10:00 AM..