Quote:
Originally Posted by JM  So what?
See Brian's blog.  |
I'm not sure why you put the 'So what' after that quote...
Anyways, I have read Brian's critique of Van Tilian Presupp. From what I remember, he argues against the strong modal version of TAG. Like I have said before, I don't hold to that version of TAG.
If I remember correctly, Brian has no problem with using the version of TAG that doesn't claim to prove the impossibility of the contrary. See my above post for why there is no inductive fallacy.
p.s. by 'strong modal version of TAG' I mean the claim that it proves the impossibility of the contrary, or as Brian puts it, gives "objective certain" proof.