Quote:
Originally Posted by KMK  The conclusion I came to in that other thread was that it might be OK to use the works of Josephus et al to come to some personal conclusions, but that those conclusions should not be established as doctrine. I am certainly not married to this conclusion, however. I look forward to other responses. |
WCF 1:9 would agree with you:
1:9 The
infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture is the Scripture itself: and therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any Scripture (which is not manifold, but one), it must be searched and known by other places that speak more clearly.