Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackCalvinist  Mark 16:9-20 is authentic.
It was cited by a late 1st cent. church father.
All of the manuscripts that omit it are primarily alexandrian in text type.... but it appears just fine in the other text types, though they are younger in age than the alexandrian ones. |
Okay..the critical vs. TR debate. With everthing I've seen on this topic that is all it ever comes down to. I suppose you have to pick your side. But even if you're a critical text guy the passage does not inject error into the narrative.