View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 12:40 AM
BlackCalvinist's Avatar
BlackCalvinist BlackCalvinist is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 1,456
Thanks: 152
Thanked 81 Times in 47 Posts
Mark 16:9-20 is authentic.

It was cited by a late 1st cent. church father.

All of the manuscripts that omit it are primarily alexandrian in text type.... but it appears just fine in the other text types, though they are younger in age than the alexandrian ones.
__________________
K. Joel Gilliard
Theologically Correct dot Com
http://www.theologicallycorrect.com
Sunday School Teacher (Elementary 2), Grace Communion Church (EFCA) http://www.gchurch.org
The Blog: THINK! - Wrestlin' With Wordz -N- Ideaz