View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2007, 02:11 PM
Davidius's Avatar
Davidius Davidius is offline.
Puritanboard Postgraduate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 4,465
Thanks: 763
Thanked 637 Times in 410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Bosse View Post
Hello CC,

As you stated, the law of indetity could be represented by:

LOI: If A, then A.

The other two laws commonly refered to as the laws of thought are the law of non-contradiction and the law of excluded middle. These could be represented as...

LNC: ~(A and ~A). ('~' represents "it is not the case that".)

LEM: (A or ~A).
Perhaps I am making this too hard on myself, lol. I do understand that the LOI is correctly expressed as If A, then A as in the quote, but I am not quite sure that I understand what that means. Is it just "If the car is red, then the car is red"? I think I'm having trouble understanding why this would even be necessary to point out and use as a necessary law. What does it mean that "without this law, identity or sameness is lost"?
__________________
DAVIDIVS DOCTVS VTRIVSQVE LINGVAE
Husband of Emilia
Member: First Reformed Presbyterian Church of Durham (RPCNA) - Durham, NC
Currently in the process of transferring membership to an as-yet-undecided church in Chapel Hill
Student: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, German Literature and Classics