Quote:
Originally Posted by prespastor  If Burgeon, Scrivener, Hills, or Letis state that the Old Syriac, Old Latin, or Latin Vulgate conform to the Byzantine Text Type please provide quotes from their works where they state that.
As for your Old Italic source...you quoted a series of Byzantine readings before (post #52) stating they were found in the Old Italic. What is your source for these quotes? |
Hay:
Matthew 17:21 - from the Old Italic:
Or questa generazione di demoni non esce fuori, se non per orazione, e per digiuno.
KJV reads:
Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting.
Textus Receptus reads (Stephens 1550):
touto de to genos ouk ekposeuetai ei un en proseuche kai nesteia.
Critical Text omits the verse.
ESV omits the verse.
The Critical Text does not follow the Old Italic on the verses cited above in post #52. However, the Old Italic does follow the Textus Receptus (Byzantine) mss on these texts, and many others as well - including the Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7,8. The Old Italic follows the Byzantine readings more closely than the Critical Text.
Blessings,
-CH
PS: As for Scrivener and the others I cited above I will provide them later. Time does not permit me to go into lengthy posts.
-CH