View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-27-2007, 11:21 AM
larryjf's Avatar
larryjf larryjf is offline.
Puritanboard Junior
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boothwyn, PA
Posts: 1,555
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 81
Thanked 357 Times in 227 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by StaunchPresbyterian View Post
Me. And since there are no MT translations available, I use the NKJV. I like the ESV a lot myself . . as a translation, that is . . I just prefer the MT to NA27 for presuppositional reasons.
I must say that i really like the NKJV because in the margins they include more textual variants than other versions. You can read the majority text (Farstad style) with a NKJV if you read the margin textual notes. Or you could read the critical text, or you could read the TR straight in the text.

Maybe i should be a NKJV-Onlyist since the word of God is preserved in that version...if you include textual variant margin notes. One way or another it's preserved in there. Is the critical text right?...it's in there. Is the majority text right?...it's in there. Is the TR right?...it's in there.

That reminds me of a Prego commercial ("it's in there").
__________________
Larry Bray
Elder - Reformed Presbyterian Church of Boothwyn, PCA
Boothwyn, PA - http://www.rpcb.org/
Free Online Reformed Seminary - http://www.tnars.net
-----------------------------------------------------
"Sin is never the better because it is in fashion." - Thomas Watson