View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2007, 02:31 PM
Magma2 Magma2 is offline.
Inactive User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 682
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul manata View Post
Because I think the whole thing should be read. It's a systematic decimation of Scripturalism.

I don't have problems with people reading it, do you?
Systematic decimation? To think you make fun of Cheung sounding like a clanging cymbal.

I for one have no problem with folks reading the thread since it demonstrates the complete vanity of those who, like you, think they have provided a "systematic decimation."

My guess is you don't understand the Scripturalism of Gordon Clark probably because you've never read any Gordon Clark . IMO you're understanding of Scripturalism comes exclusively from the hands of inept critics like "Pondscum" and that natural theologian M. Sudduth. BTW ever read what VT thought of natural theology?
__________________
Sean Gerety
Member
Calvary Presbyterian, PCA
Norfolk, VA

“I don't really like disconcerting people. Although often when I try to be normal I disconcert anyway." Robert Wyatt