Quote:
Originally Posted by polemic_turtle  I was struck that this is somewhat like what Dr. Bahnsen says when he points out that most modern apologists act as though the laws of logic were settled and undisputed; 'tis simply not the case and I wonder whether or not the same thing could be said about evangelical opinions on inerrancy. | I would refer you to Bahnsen's actual position on inerrancy, as he expounded it, "The Inerrancy of the Autographa," pp. 150-193 in Norman Geisler, ed., Inerrancy Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1980).
DTK
__________________
Sola Scriptura est norma normans non normata
David T. King, pastor
Christ Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Elkton, Maryland
Augustine (354-430): Therefore what He [i.e., Christ] has deigned to speak to us, we ought to believe that He meant us to understand. But if we do not understand He, being asked, gives understanding, who gave His Word unasked. NPNF1: Vol. VII, Tractates on John, Tractate XXII, ยง1.
|