Quote:
Originally Posted by Magma2  ... The job of Christian apologetics is to present our hearers with a choice (just read the final page or two of Clark's "Thales to Dewey" to get a flavor of how this might be done. Then read the rest of the book in order to do it). As John Frame put it, and which is something Paul should seriously take to heart, “Clark’s method is more like an exploration than like a proof. By renouncing proof, he avoids the circularity of having to prove the axiom by means of the axiom.” Amen. I don’t know that Clark could have said it better himself... |
Good post! I still think a debate on epistemology would be good. I have yet to hear a viable alternative to Scripturalism.
P.S. We can call it a
discussion if it makes anyone feel better. Nothing formal. Just toss some ideas around. See if anyone really knows anything.
