OK, JerusalemBlade. I have noted your recent polemics against critical/eclectic texts, but this sort of apocalyptic rhetoric against critical editions is far, far off-track.
You want to frame this debate in terms of theology and presuppositions, yet you don't seem to notice that there are many inerranist Christians - who are both Reformed and presuppositional - who hold to the critical method. WTS, WSC, RTS all use Nestle-Aland or UBS Greek Texts and BHS Old Testaments. Dallas Theological is the only place I can think of where the Majority Text is promoted (and this still doesn't get you to the Textus Receptus anyway).
Greg Bahnsen himself had to put Andrew Sandlin in his place some years ago over these sorts to attacks on the eclectic texts:
http://www.kjvonly.org/other/dr_theo...theonomy-L.htm
James White has also deflated the "ecclesiastical text" rhetoric from Doug Wilson:
http://www.credenda.org/issues/10-1disputatio.php
We can affirm God's providential hand in preserving the genuine text of the Bible, even if we believe He has done so through varying manuscript traditions.