View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2006, 11:14 AM
PuritanBouncer's Avatar
PuritanBouncer PuritanBouncer is offline.
I pity the fool! (who says in his heart "There is no God")
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Broad Top, Pa.
Posts: 7,449
Blog Entries: 8
Thanks: 23
Thanked 146 Times in 108 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by blhowes
Quote:
1. Literal (also called normal): interpret Scripture literally taking into account normal literary devices such as metaphors, simile, hyperbole, and figurative language
Just so that I don't put words into people's mouths, this isn't saying to take into account metaphors, simile, hyperbole, and figurative language...but then interpret it literally, is it? When taking into account such things, what principles are used to determine if the literary devices override the literal interpretation?
Excellent question and exactly why it's so difficult to debate dispensationalists! For example, the very beginning of Revelation. The letters to the seven churches were written to a literal seven churches correct? CT and Dispy beliefs would agree with that regarding literalism. So where does the idea that these seven letters were also written to a future generation as well? How do we know what "Church age" we are in?

It's simple stuff like this that convinced me of the errors of dispy thought and teaching. Literally!
__________________
Adam Leavelle
Westminster OPC
Roaring Spring Pa.

http://www.myspace.com/aleavelle
"Speak wisdom to a fool and he'll think you have no sense at all"

Click to get: Board Rules -- Signature Requirements -- Suggestions?