View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-05-2005, 11:50 AM
VirginiaHuguenot VirginiaHuguenot is offline.
Puritanboard Librarian
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N/A
Posts: 24,012
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 2,636
Thanked 3,523 Times in 2,014 Posts
Images of Christ are sinful whether one is actively/directly worshipping it or not. As Thomas Vincent has said, "It is not lawful to have pictures of Jesus Christ, because his divine nature cannot be pictured at all; and because his body, as it is now glorified, cannot be pictured as it is; and because, if it do not stir up devotion, it is in vain"”if it do stir up devotion, it is a worshipping by an image or picture, and so a palpable breach of the second commandment."

The second commandment requires us, "according to each one´s place and calling, (to) remov(e) it, and all monuments of idolatry.[528]"

[528] Deuteronomy 7:5. But thus shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break down their images, and cut down their groves, and burn their graven images with fire. Isaiah 30:22. Ye shall defile also the covering of thy graven images of silver, and the ornament of thy molten images of gold: thou shalt cast them away as a menstruous cloth; thou shalt say unto it, Get thee hence.

We may have no part in facilitating blatant idolatry, but we must also respect authority. A religious objection to posting an idolatrous picture put forth in a gracious and humble manner ought to be respected by a reasonable boss. If not, then there may be sacrifice required for the sake of Jesus, who teaches us not to make images of the Godhead (Rom. 1.23; Acts 17.29).

Praying for grace and wisdom, brother!
__________________
Andrew