09-21-2005, 10:41 AM
|
 | Puritanboard Graduate | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,606
Thanks: 39
Thanked 199 Times in 96 Posts
| |
Quote: Originally posted by VirginiaHuguenot
I know what you mean...
Did you happen to read about the debate between George Gillespie and Thomas Coleman -- it sounds like some modern-day debates on the PB 
Quote: |
Gillespie also carried on a spirited debate with Thomas Coleman, the leader of the Erastians. Now in one volume, one can read the entire debate, beginning with GG's Brotherly Examination, a response to Coleman's original tenets based on Job. 11:20, followed by Coleman's own response, A Brotherly Examination Re-Examined (1646). Gillespie returned the volley with Nothing Answered, which was rejoined by Coleman's Thou Indeed Speakest Amiss (orig. Maledicis Maledicis). Finally Gillespie responded with Thou Hearest Amiss (orig. Male Audis), before the controversy subsided for a while.
| | And we wonder why each theonomy thread goes 200+ posts long!
__________________
Chris Rhoades -33 Good Shepherd Presbyterian Church (PCA) Nashville, TN-Under Care Vera theologia non theoretica, sed practica est; Finis siquidem eius agere est hoc est vitam vivere deiformem. - Martin Bucer ""True theology is not theoretical, but practical. The end of it is living, that is to live a godly life." |