[quote:8cdd10cbcf][i:8cdd10cbcf]Originally posted by paul manata[/i:8cdd10cbcf]
Ricky,





I mus disagree with ONE thin you said above. That is, grantig my view on Heb. 10 is not logically equivolent to granting infant baptism. Indeed, I know some baptists who hold my view. But all that means to them is that there are non-elect covenant members. But they believe one can only be baptized as a professor.
Now, I do believe that this takesthem a stepcloser. And I believe that it is a gtood thing that they admit. Because the next fortres to fall is their view on covenant members. o, they ae only one step away instead of two. That's the way I see it...but we still nizzles! (sorry forthe typing. I'm on vaction in colorado and I have a jacked-up keyboard ad can barey see the screen)
-Paul [/quote:8cdd10cbcf]

Yes I agree, what I was saying is that its a logical step to give infants the sign IF there are actually NC breakers and non-elect covenant members, the "there are no NC breakers/elect only" argument diminishes for then we can in fact baptize them into the covenant community etc etc.... I sure you know where I going with that.

I know that they would not just jump to our side just with that but must realize that its bible logic.

Thanx for clearing that up, duke!

your homey, Roldan:biggrin:

__________________
Richard W. Roldan "Ricky"
Member and Teacher of Iglesia Presbiteriana Reformada Berea (PCA)
Winter Haven, FL./ Under Care of the Southwest Presb.(PCA)

"Go therefore and make disciples of all nations,...” Jesus

" I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel," Paul